Trucking Law
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Rss
(717) 240-4686
1200 Walnut Bottom Rd., Suite 331 | Carlisle, PA 17015
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Alyssa Adams
    • Angela Rainey
    • Jennifer Mulligan
    • Douglas B. Marcello
    • Sonya Kivisto
  • Video
  • Blog
  • Newsletters
  • Cases / Articles
  • Resources
  • Contact
    • Directions
Search the site...
Home» CSA 2010 » DATA Q APPEAL BOARD IN ARIZONA

DATA Q APPEAL BOARD IN ARIZONA

Posted by Doug Marcello - October 9, 2011 - CSA 2010, FMCSA, General, Transportation, Transportation Law, Transportation News, Trucking, Trucking Legal News, Trucking Safety
1

Arizona has developed a DataQ appeal board.  John Backowski of Contracted Driver Services, Inc. explained the program which he was instrumental in developing at the ATA Safety & Human Resources Conference.

The panel consists of 4 Highway Patrol officers and 1 industry representative and meets on a weekly basis.  Decisions are by majority rule. 

Only Arizona violations can be appealed.  Moving violations are not subject to appeal.  Appeals are only available for Data Q challenges that are closed (“no action taken”).

Since its inception in January, 2011 through August, 2011, of the 83 challenges reviewed, 21 were overturned.  This is a 21% reversal rate.

The Arizona system provides a mechanicism for review of Data Q decisions.  This is a mechanicism for consideration by other jurisdictions.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • E-Mail

One comment on “DATA Q APPEAL BOARD IN ARIZONA”

  1. Pam Zoeller, City of Fun Carnival, Inc says:
    September 28, 2012 at 8:30 pm

    Our company was recently given a citation as the carrier on a truck and trailer that do not belong to the City of Fun Carnival, Inc. fleet. Citation #AZ0094004324 Driver name Steve C Goodman #D06478416 owner of said vehicle is RJC Concessions FED #203609828 DOT#1424773
    146 Pawnee
    Onalaska, Texas 77360
    The owner of this equipment is Robert Simard and Goodmans’ boss. He does not put his DOT# on his vehicles, doesnt stop at ports, no logs, etc… He contracts as an independent game operator with City of Fun. Why did
    this officer decided it was City of Fun equipment?? B Bullard #5515
    We would appreciate having this report/citation removed from our record. Thank you

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Articles

Blog - Subscribe by Email

Get an email whenever a new article is posted.


 

Find us on Facebook

(c) Copyright 2013 Marcello & Kivisto, LLC. All rights reserved. M&K is focused upon transportation law (Pennsylvania Trucking Litigation)