Archive for the 'CSA 2010' Category

DATA Q APPEAL BOARD IN ARIZONA

Posted on October 9th, 2011 by transportationlegalnews

Arizona has developed a DataQ appeal board.  John Backowski of Contracted Driver Services, Inc. explained the program which he was instrumental in developing at the ATA Safety & Human Resources Conference.

The panel consists of 4 Highway Patrol officers and 1 industry representative and meets on a weekly basis.  Decisions are by majority rule. 

Only Arizona violations can be appealed.  Moving violations are not subject to appeal.  Appeals are only available for Data Q challenges that are closed (“no action taken”).

Since its inception in January, 2011 through August, 2011, of the 83 challenges reviewed, 21 were overturned.  This is a 21% reversal rate.

The Arizona system provides a mechanicism for review of Data Q decisions.  This is a mechanicism for consideration by other jurisdictions.

CSA Wisdom for the Future

Posted on April 12th, 2011 by transportationlegalnews

A CSA 2010 scoring provider at the ATA Safety Conference concluded the following:

-“Logs, lamps, and speeding” in the CSA 2010 mantra of data miners, as these items are by far the greatest point generators;

-Fatigued driving is now the greatest area of focus of the CSA scoring program with all other BASICs tied for second place;

-Between 6% and 8% of the drivers result in 85% of the CSA points;

-Inspections are performed for one of the reasons as follows:

a.  A moving violation;

b.  An observable defect on the vehicle (light out, missing mud flap,…);

c.  Everything else (high ISS score, aggressive enforcement,…).

-Of the above inspections above, a. and b. (moving violations and observable defects):

a.  Are within the control of the driver;

b.  Account for 20% of the inspections;

c.  Account of 80% of the points.

Consider this data in your company.  Remind your drivers that 80% of the CSA points are within their control based upon the data to date. With the Pre-Employment Screen Program (PSP), in addition to CSA, those points are their points too.  And for the driver, they stay on for three years. Bottom line–go with the percentages to reduce CSA points. Especially in light of the recent publication of CSA data, minimizing points can significantly mitigate the need for trucking litigation, and can even be used to bolster a company’s reputation and social standing as a defender of safe driving.

Marcello & Kivisto Resources on Trucking Litigation

Posted on April 4th, 2011 by transportationlegalnews

Marcello & Kivisto, in addition to creating a monthly newsletter, offers many informative documents on trucking litigation and trucking news. Some of these are available on the website at the resources page. Other documents are also available, such as follows:

  • Hours-of-Service Rules Safety Impact 2010 Analysis Compiled by ARTI
  • Accident Preparedness DVD or Forms
  • Powerpoint by Dr. Hickman regarding Distracted Driving Study

Just call or email today for these and other resources.

Companywide Knowledge of CSA Fundamentals

Posted on December 30th, 2010 by transportationlegalnews

CSA awareness is vital for the entire company. All members of your team need to know the fundamentals. Points are not just a function of drivers.

  • Maintenance–deferred repairs or missed maintenance means points. Visible vehicle defects (lights, mudflaps,…) result in roadsides and ring up points. Out-of-service, by itself, is another 2 points (times 3 for the first 6 months). Maintenance and drivers must  work together to identify and eliminate these defects.
  • Operations-increased vigilance to hours-of service availability of drivers. For example, dispatched runs that necessitate speeding, results in 5 points for the company, none for the driver.
  • Safety-monitoring documentation saves points. Missed medicals (2 points), inadequate training (4 points), and lacking a proper endorsement (8 points) can add up in the Driver Fitness BASIC.

NEW HOURS RULES

Posted on December 29th, 2010 by transportationlegalnews

The FMCSA has released the long awaited and much anticipated proposed hours-of-service rules.  Links to the proposed rules, FMCSA website, and ATA’s Hours-of-Service website in the column to the right.

The FMCSA’s press-release states as follows:

FMCSA Issues Proposed Rule on Hours-of-Service Requirements for Commercial Truck Drivers

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) today issued a regulatory proposal that would revise hours-of-service (HOS) requirements for commercial truck drivers.

“A fatigued driver has no place behind the wheel of a large commercial truck,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We are committed to an hours-of-service rule that will help create an environment where commercial truck drivers are rested, alert and focused on safety while on the job.”

The publication of this proposed rule coincides with the timeframe established in a court settlement agreement that requires FMCSA to publish a final HOS rule by July 26, 2011.

This new HOS proposal would retain the “34-hour restart” provision allowing drivers to restart the clock on their weekly 60 or 70 hours by taking at least 34 consecutive hours off-duty.  However, the restart period would have to include two consecutive off-duty periods from midnight to 6:00 a.m.  Drivers would be allowed to use this restart only once during a seven-day period.

Additionally the proposal would require commercial truck drivers to complete all driving within a 14-hour workday, and to complete all on-duty work-related activities within 13 hours to allow for at least a one hour break.  It also leaves open for comment whether drivers should be limited to 10 or 11 hours of daily driving time, although FMCSA currently favors a 10-hour limit.

“In January, we began this rulemaking process by hosting five public listening sessions with stakeholders across the country,” said FMCSA Administrator Anne S. Ferro. “This proposed rule provides another opportunity for the public to weigh in on a safety issue that impacts everyone on our roadways.”

Driving hours are regulated by federal HOS rules, which are designed to prevent commercial vehicle-related crashes and fatalities by prescribing on-duty and rest periods for drivers.

Commercial truck drivers who violate this proposed rule would face civil penalties of up to $2,750 for each offense. Trucking companies that allow their drivers to violate the proposal’s driving limits would face penalties of up to $11,000 for each offense.

Other key provisions include the option of extending a driver’s daily shift to 16 hours twice a week to accommodate for issues such as loading and unloading at terminals or ports, and allowing drivers to count some time spent parked in their trucks toward off-duty hours.

A copy of the rulemaking proposal is available on FMCSA’s Web site at http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/HOS.  The rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register on December 29 and the public will then have 60 days to comment.  Information on how to submit comments and evidentiary material is available at http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/HOS.

Courtesy FMCSA – Dec. 23, 2010 Press Release.

Driver Score Awareness & Roadside Awareness

Posted on December 14th, 2010 by transportationlegalnews

It is business-critical that drivers appreciate the importance of their score to the company.  Equally important, however, is its significance to them.  Here are three reasons:

Driver Score Awareness

  • Drivers’ scores will be kept by the Driver Safety Management System (DSMS). While not available to the public, it is available to FMCS investigators, suggesting the potential use of their record.
  • Drivers’ future employers see their CSA violations in the Pre-Employment Screening Program. Their future in the industry depends on keeping down their individual score.
  • No freight means no jobs for drivers. Shippers and brokers may be reluctant to ship with carriers with bad scores.

Roadside Awareness

Roadside inspections are a key opportunity for drivers and companies to reduce their points. Drivers must understand several important factors about roadside inspections:

  • Points come from commercial vehicle roadside inspections. Not from their private car. Not from tickets while in their truck if there is no roadside inspection report. Only roadside inspection reports and crashes generate points.
  • Clean roadside inspections lower scores. Scores are based on averages. Averages for several BASICS are calculated by dividing your points by the number of roadsides. More clean roadsides, the lower you average.
  • Points for an event can vary depending on how it is written on the roadside inspection report. Speeding, without a speed on the report, is 5 points. However, speeding documented on the report as 1-5 m.p.h. over is only 1 point and 6-10 over is 4 points. How the event is written up can add points which are then multiplied by 3 for the first 6 months. In Pennsylvania, a ticket for “failure to obey a traffic control device”, a common “break” for speeders, puts no points on a MVR, but 5 points on a CSA score.

CSA by the Numbers

Posted on November 30th, 2010 by transportationlegalnews

CSA is about to go live, making company scores available for scrutiny by the public.  More importantly, the scores will be available to brokers, shippers, and insurers.  

It is an opportunity.  CSA is a ranking of comparable companies-the lower your points-percentage, the better.  Minimizing your score relative to those in your group is vital to improving your ranking.

This makes point-generating events even more important.  Here are some lists of actions you can take to keep your score in check. 

You can get more CSA related information on our webpage, www.cdl-law.com, in our blog entries as well as links to 20 minute webinars.

FMCSA Has Until November 4th to Respond to OOIDA’s Challenge to EOBR Final Rule

Posted on November 23rd, 2010 by transportationlegalnews

In April, FMCSA issued a final rule regarding Electronic On-Board Recorders (EOBRs) for carriers who are chronically in violation of hours of service. In June, OOIDA filed a petition challenging the final rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. FMCSA has until November 4, 2010 to file a response to the petition challenging the rule.

Relation of Traffic Tickets to CSA

Posted on November 21st, 2010 by transportationlegalnews

Much confusion surrounds the role and relation of traffic tickts to CSA scores.  Let’s start with the basics.

Only traffic tickets in conjunction with a roadside inspection result in CSA points.  A ticket in your car does not count.  A ticket in your commercial mv without a roadside inspection does not count.  If it is not written up on the roadside, it does not count.

Think of this way–tickets are reported to the state motor vehicle department.  They are applied to a driver’s mvr.  Roadside inspections are ultimately reported to the federal government.  These reports are the basis for your CSA score.  If a roadside inspection report also includes a violation for which a ticket was issued, CSA points will result. 

Tickets are challenged through the judicial process.  If you are found not guilty or the ticket is dismissed, it comes off of your mvr. 

However, for a ticket issued in conjunction with a roadside, the outcome of the hearing will NOT remove the points from your CSA score.  You must submit a challenge via Data-Q to remove the CSA points.  This is done by going to https://dataqs.fmcsa.gov/.

Data-Q is the appeal process for CSA points.  Drivers or companies may submit challenges to any roadside violation via Data-Q, whether or not a ticket was issued. 

Further, just because you won on the ticket does not, by itself, mean that you will be sucessful on the subsequent Data-Q.  You must independently support your Data-Q appeal, regardless of the outcome of the ticket.  In fact, you do not need to challenge and win the ticket to succeed in the Data-Q.  They are separate and distinct.

State your support for your Data-Q challenge.  Set out the basis why the roadside violation should be removed in a way that a person reviewing the request can understand and be persuaded by the correctness of your challenge.  Just because you say it does not make it so–support your position with facts and information.

Each state has an office that reviews the Data-Q challenges.  Each may have its own rules.  For example, in Pennsylvania, a driver must submit a Data-Q appeal within 30 days of the roadside while a company has a year.

Have You Checked Your CSA2010 BASICS Assessment?

Posted on October 27th, 2010 by transportationlegalnews

FMCSA’s Data Preview Website is now available. As of August 2010, motor carriers are able to preview their basement under the BASICs.

Beginning in December of 2010 motor carriers will be able to access full SMS results and BASIC basements. In December of 2010, this information will also be available to the public, with the exception of the Crash Indicator.

Be proactive as the government implements CSA2010 and preview your assessment. The CSA2010 Timeline indicates that in the fall/winter of 2010 FMCSA will begin to issue warning letters to carriers with deficient BASICs as well as roadside inspectors will begin to use the CSMS results to identify carriers for inspections.